Layout Guidelines
Stratego -- Strategies for Program Transformation
Good layout is important for the readability and hence maintainability of programs. This holds for any programming language. Stratego aims at not only providing a language for
programming program
transformations, but also doing so in an understandable way. Refactoring is an important
tool to create readable specifications, but good layout is a good starting point.
Layout is not significant for the semantics. Stratego does
not use the offside rule. This means that you can be liberal with placing newlines.
Of course, layout is determined by taste, but experience suggests several conventions that lead to readable specifications. This page discusses some conventions. Actual situations may call for other
decisions.
Principles
Specifications should be layed out such that they
- can be printed on standard paper
- fit on a 80 character display (editor, browser)
Rules
Short rules are better than long ones.
Put a short rule on a single line:
AZ : Plus(Int(0), x) -> x
Split a longer rule into a line with the label and a line with the left-hand side and right-hand side:
TrCx :
Cx(e, t, f) -> CJUMP(NE, e, CONST(0), t, f)
Indent the label of a rule with two spaces and the left-hand side with another two. More is a waste
of space.
Putting the label on a line by itself makes it stand out, making it easier to locate. Also it makes
the appearance of the text more regular if all left-hand sides start at the same indentation.
Split long rule over multiple lines
TrExp :
If(e1, e2, e3) ->
ESEQ([Cx(e1, t, f),
LABEL(t),
MOVE(TEMP(tmp), e2),
JUMP(NAME(done), [done]),
LABEL(f),
MOVE(TEMP(tmp), e3),
LABEL(done)],
TEMP(tmp))
where new => t; new => f; new => done; new => tmp
Strategy Definitions
For strategies similar guidelines apply.
Put a short definition on a single line.
For a longer definition put the body on the line after the name operator name
tr-stm(s, e) =
MOVE(e,e) + EXP(e) + JUMP(e,id) + CJUMP(id,e,e,id,id) +
SEQ(s,s) + SEQ(list(s)) + NUL + LABEL(id) + LET(id, e)
--
EelcoVisser - 28 Apr 2002
StrategoGlossary